“Forts Night” has been boycotted by players, and a lot of bad AI art material has been denounced.

With the end of the Simpson family ‘ s mini-season season, Fort Night is officially on line in chapter VII, which not only introduces a combination of “Kill Bill ” but also contains the classic “Pussy Wagon” vehicle skin. However, the focus of the player discussions is not on these new elements, but rather on some of the suspected use of AI-generated art material in the new section.

The controversial fuse is a poster of a snow monster lying on a hammock, and the visible nine toenails bare-cut show the essence of their AI generation. After many years of development, AI mapping remains difficult to handle. There’s a player tune: “I can’t draw well, but at least I know I shouldn’t draw four toes on one foot and five toes on the other.”

In addition to this, billboards and paintings in other games have been challenged for the vagueness common to AI drawings, in which the role of ” Back to the Future ” , Matty McFly, in the form of an animated paint-painting pattern, has caused similar attention (as in the case of the numerous misuse of AI design in Mission Call: Black Action 7).

“If you remember correctly, Marty’s paint is part of the battle pass and the player needs to pay for it”, a Reddit user noted, “In view of this and the subject of Harry Potter, which is rumored for the next season, I decided to retreat.” It is worth mentioning that Chief Executive Officer Tim Sweeney’s recent statement that “AI is bound to infiltrate the production of the game” made it a target on Reddit. Users have pointed out, “Why not replace Svennie with AI, since AI can do a lot of complex work?” In Reddit, a hot post entitled ” Say no to AI, 100 billion companies should hire real artists to create real art ” , players focused on the suspected AI-generated posters and paint groups in the game, and some users even called for a boycott. The post has now received more than 3,000 hits.

Another hot post shows the controversial nine-tip snow monster poster. “I only want AI to do the mechanical work to speed up the development process, not to create links,” a disgruntled player says, “A company naturally wants to replace all jobs with AI to reduce human costs.” Another user added: “Even if not all players would have noticed the AI content, it would not have changed the fact that the generation of AI damaged the environment, poached artists’ works and of poor quality, which is simply lazy, not to mention the fact that these posters are optional. If the public does not collectively reject AI, then don’t be surprised when the quality of the skin, music, etc. generated by AI falls in the future.”

On the eve of the outbreak of the debate, Tim Sveni had just publicly questioned the need for an AI label. In response to a former developer of an imaginary engine using AI to carry out a drive, he said, “There is no point requiring the developer to disclose whether or not to use a generating AI.” The developer had argued that “Steam and other digital platforms should cancel the ‘AI made’ label, which is irrelevant”. Tim Sweeney echoed that: “Approves. The AI label applies only to art exhibitions that require a declaration of authorship, and to digitally authorized markets where copyrights are identified. It makes no sense to introduce this label in a game store, after all, almost all future productions will involve AI.”

According to the data, the final chapter of Chapter 6 of Fort Night attracted 10.5 million players to experience online and 3 million other viewers to view it live. In celebration of the new chapter, Epic officially launched chapter VII, “With Coast Breaking”, to synchronize the new map areas, streamline construction systems and reward for combat passes.

Leave a Reply